Editorials

Central Maine: Natural gas is not as clean as we’ve been led to believe

The study on methane emissions by the Environmental Defense Fund, as reported in a Washington Post story published in this paper June 22 (“Study says methane leaks offset natural gas benefits,” Page A3), should be a wake-up call to homeowners, business persons and municipal officials in Maine, who are considering heating options for their buildings or communities.

Read more>>

The Columbus Dispatch: Natural gas changes merit Earth Day celebration

While natural gas burns cleaner than coal, it also poses environmental risks because it consists primarily of methane, a greenhouse gas responsible for a quarter of global warming.

Some of the risk can be mitigated with better controls on leaks of methane into the atmosphere from wells and storage tanks, and the Kasich administration is a recognized leader in ensuring that happens — at least for newer facilities.

Read more>>

Billings Gazette: Methane waste debate flares again

Gas that leaks or flares from America’s public lands benefits no one. That’s why regulations to prevent waste can provide broad benefits.

Contrary to that common sense conclusion, the Trump administration has been trying to undo waste prevention rules finalized at the end of 2016 after years of public comment and study.

Read more>>

The Canton Repository: Well explosion reignites concern over methane

About three weeks ago, a natural gas well exploded and caught fire in southeastern Ohio’s Belmont County. According to a report from the Associated Press, the newly drilled well was being readied for production for XTO Energy when an incident occurred — a plume of gas and brine rising into the air before igniting.

Read more>>

San Antonio Express-News: Court blocks Trump on methane

One promising hallmark of President Donald Trump’s tenure has been the ability of federal courts to check his administration’s impulsive actions.

A recent appeals court ruling on methane emissions is an important example. By a 2-1 margin, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit struck down the Environmental Protection Agency’s 90-day suspension of new methane emissions standards for oil and gas wells.

My San Antonio: Court blocks Trump on methane

One promising hallmark of President Donald Trump’s tenure has been the ability of federal courts to check his administration’s impulsive actions.

A recent appeals court ruling on methane emissions is an important example. By a 2-1 margin, the U.S. Court of Appealsfor the District of Columbia Circuit struck down the Environmental Protection Agency’s 90-day suspension of new methane emissions standards for oil and gas wells.

The EPA had delayed implementation of the new rule for 90 days and has proposed extending that delay for another two years. The court found this was a smoke screen for repealing the rule without following the appropriate process.

Read more>>

Will Trump era undo Utah air quality progress?-Salt Lake Tribune

Meanwhile, Rep. Rob Bishop sees deregulatory opportunity in the U.S. Bureau of Land Management's rule on methane escaping from oil and gas operations. The Obama BLM recently put out rules to require operators to trap more methane, a change that not only cleans up the air but also gives operators more natural gas to sell. But Bishop wants Congress to rescind the methane rule, something he's betting a Trump BLM won't challenge.

When Rules No Longer Apply-New York Times

Mr. Trump won the presidency, in part, by promising to hold powerful interests accountable for practices that harm the public. But nullifying final rules — which went through a long, public process on the way to being issued — elevates corporate interests above all others

Just because the GOP can doesn't mean it should-Washington Post

Congress’s moves would be less concerning except for one of the most powerful provisions in the Congressional Review Act: a stipulation that, once lawmakers have rescinded a rule, federal agencies cannot issue a new one “substantially” like it. This legal standard has not been tested in court. But it means that Congress may be essentially barring agencies such as the Interior Department from revisiting issues such as methane pollution on federal lands in a rigorous way. That is not a legacy the 115th Congress should be seeking.

The largest methane leak in U.S. history began one year ago at Aliso Canyon. What have we learned since then?-Los Angeles Times

The leak was a wake-up call. Too few people had recognized the tremendous risks of Aliso Canyon —that an aging facility operating under grossly outdated and inadequate standards could wreak havoc on public health and the environment. About 80% of the facility’s wells were built before the 1970s, and Southern California Gas knew they were corroding and failing at an increasing rate. But there were no rules mandating frequent inspections or upgrades. What’s more, government officials didn’t seem sufficiently concerned that the state’s energy supply had become so heavily dependent on Aliso Canyon.

1 2 3 6